🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.